Simulated view of the new Montlake lid looking west. |
View an animated video of the project design: - YouTube - Streaming WMV
Stay tuned to the ESSB 6392 Workgroup for the latest design refinements to the SR 520, I-5 to Medina preferred alternative.
|
What are the key features of the project design?
- A new six-lane corridor from I-5 to Medina that includes two general-purpose and one transit/HOV lane in each direction.
- Reversible transit/HOV ramp to the I-5 express lanes; headed from the Eastside to downtown Seattle in the morning and from downtown Seattle to the Eastside in the evening.
- A six-lane Portage Bay Bridge with a westbound managed shoulder.
- An urban interchange at Montlake Boulevard.
- A second bascule bridge across the Montlake Cut that provides additional capacity for transit/HOV, bicycles and pedestrians.
- A space between the west approach bridge structures that could accommodate potential future light rail and connect to the University Link light rail station.
- A 14-foot-wide bicycle/pedestrian path across Lake Washington.
- Environmental improvements, including noise reduction features, stormwater treatment, removal of unused R.H. Thomson ramps to restore park land and habitats, and improvements for fish and wetlands plants.
Note: Click each image to expand as a PDF.
| I-5 interchange |
|
| |
Portage Bay Bridge Note: Final bridge design aesthetics are still to be determined |
|
| |
| Montlake interchange |
|
| |
| West Approach and Floating Bridge |
|
How will the project design accommodate high capacity transit?
Bus rapid transit first
- WSDOT, King Country Metro, and Sound Transit identified bus rapid transit as the first priority for the SR 520 corridor in the December 2008 SR 520 High Capacity Transit Plan (pdf 3 mb).
- A network of bus rapid transit lines could be operational when the new SR 520 corridor is open.
- Maintain opportunities for rail-to-bus transfers at the future Montlake Multimodal Center, which will include the Sound Transit University Link line.
Corridor is rail-ready when the time is right
- The Sound Transit 2 plan funds a planning study of light rail in the SR 520 (pdf 685 kb) corridor to evaluate potential alignments, stations, costs and implementation strategies.
| Range of potential light rail alignments from SR 520 to the University Link station |
|
Light rail option 1: Convert transit/HOV lanes to light rail

Light rail option 2: Add additional light rail-only lanes
 |
What will the new west side look like?
Note: Click each image to expand as a PDF.
| Sketches of the Montlake vicinity |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
| Bus stops on the Montlake lid |
24th Avenue/Montlake interchange |
Open space on the Montlake lid |
 |
 |
 |
| Foster Island |
Lake Washington Boulevard |
Portage Bay Bridge |
| Sketches of the SR 520 corridor |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| SR 520 looking northwest |
SR 520 looking southwest |
SR 520 looking southeast |
New floating bridge |
How was the project design developed?
| 1997-2000 |
Trans-Lake Washington Study |
|
Evaulated multiple options to cross Lake Washington: • Four-lane options • Six-lane options • Eight-lane options • Alternative modes |
| 2000-2004 |
Trans-Lake Washington Project |
|
Narrowed options to cross Lake Washington: • Six-lane with high capacity transit options including light rail. • Eight-lane with high capacity transit options including light rail. • Established SR 520 as a tolled facility |
| August 2006 |
Draft EIS |
|
Draft EIS published and analyzes three alternatives: • 4-Lane Alternative • 6-Lane Alternative - Pacific Street Interchange option - Second Montlake Bridge option - No Montlake Freeway Transit Stop option • 8-Lane Alternative |
| December 2006 |
Gov. Gregoire report: A Path Forward to Action |
|
Identified the 6-Lane Alternative as the state’s preferred alternative |
| Spring 2007 |
Legislature passed ESSB 6099 |
|
• Began mediation process • Endorsed 4+2 configuration (four general-purpose lanes and two transit/HOV lanes) • Began developing SR 520 High Capacity Transit Plan |
| December 2008 |
Mediation ends SR 520 High Capacity Transit Plan completed |
|
Mediation group identified three six-lane design options to analyze in Supplemental Draft EIS: • Option A with suboptions (pdf 8 mb) • Option K with suboptions (pdf 8 mb) • Option L with suboptions (pdf 8 mb)
WSDOT, King County Metro and Sound Transit released SR 520 High Capacity Transit Plan which defined bus rapid transit across the corridor |
| Spring 2009 |
Legislature passed ESHB 2211 |
|
Authorized tolling on SR 520 and formed SR 520 Legislative Workgroup |
| January 2010 |
SR 520 Legislative Workgroup Supplemental Draft EIS |
|
SR 520 Legislative Workgroup recommended a six-lane design option with an interchange at Montlake Boulevard (Option A+)
Supplemental Draft EIS published and analyzes three 6-Lane Alternative design options: • Option A with suboptions • Option K with suboptions • Option L with suboptions |
| April 2010 |
Preferred alternative |
|
State identifies preferred 6-Lane Alternative • I-5 interchange (pdf 426 kb) • Portage Bay Bridge (pdf 514 kb) • Montlake interchange (pdf 486 kb) • Floating bridge and west approach (pdf 333 kb) • Montlake multimodal operations (pdf 1.5 mb) |